docs: Document TW #2422
This commit is contained in:
@@ -90,6 +90,8 @@
|
|||||||
Thanks to emkamau.
|
Thanks to emkamau.
|
||||||
- TW #2403 Undefined symbols (with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON)
|
- TW #2403 Undefined symbols (with -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS=ON)
|
||||||
Thanks to Jan Palus for contributing.
|
Thanks to Jan Palus for contributing.
|
||||||
|
- TW #2422 "eow" and "eonw" seem to use different week day as reference
|
||||||
|
Thanks to bgravato for reporting.
|
||||||
- TW #2428 The "edit" command should respect "bulk" configuration option
|
- TW #2428 The "edit" command should respect "bulk" configuration option
|
||||||
Thanks to Evan Edmond.
|
Thanks to Evan Edmond.
|
||||||
- TW #2442 Bulk completions generate nagging message even if highest urgency
|
- TW #2442 Bulk completions generate nagging message even if highest urgency
|
||||||
|
|||||||
2
NEWS
2
NEWS
@@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ Fixed regressions in 2.6.0
|
|||||||
- The "end of <date>" named dates ('eod', 'eow', ...) were pointing to the
|
- The "end of <date>" named dates ('eod', 'eow', ...) were pointing to the
|
||||||
first second of the next day, instead of last second of the referenced
|
first second of the next day, instead of last second of the referenced
|
||||||
interval. This was a regression introduced in 2.5.2.
|
interval. This was a regression introduced in 2.5.2.
|
||||||
|
- The "eow" and "eonw" were using a different weekday as a reference. This
|
||||||
|
was a regeression introduced in 2.5.2.
|
||||||
- The rc.verbose=<value> configuration override was applied only if it were
|
- The rc.verbose=<value> configuration override was applied only if it were
|
||||||
the first configuration override. In #2247, this manifested itself as
|
the first configuration override. In #2247, this manifested itself as
|
||||||
inability to supress footnotes about the overrides, and in #1953 as failure
|
inability to supress footnotes about the overrides, and in #1953 as failure
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user